Samsung WB2200F vs Canon SX520 HS

Cameras
Compare Cameras
Samsung WB2200F vs Canon SX520 HS

Leave Feedback

1/2.3 inch 28.1mm²
16.3 megapixels
20.00mm - 1200.00mm (35mm eq.)

Go in depth with our full Samsung WB2200F Review.
See real-world photos taken with the WB2200F.

1/2.3 inch 28.1mm²
16.0 megapixels
24.00mm - 1008.00mm (35mm eq.)

Go in depth with our full Canon SX520 HS Review.

Buy From

Differences

Samsung WB2200F advantages over Canon SX520 HS

Eye-level viewfinder
Eye-level vs Rear display only
You'll be able to frame photos even when the sun is out
In-camera panoramas
Yes vs No
Stitches multiple shots into a panoramic photo
Larger lens aperture
f/2.8 vs f/3.4
Take photos in low-light or isolate your subject
Built-in Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi vs None
Share your photos wirelessly
More telephoto lens reach
1,200 mm vs 1,008 mm
Capture objects farther away
Longer stills battery life
More info

Longer stills battery life

Cameras with longer battery life can take more photos before exhausting their batteries.

Special note: The measurement standard for battery life stipulates that if a camera has an internal flash, it must be used for 50% of photos taken. For this reason, comparisons of one camera with an internal flash to another without will not be comparable

600 vs 210 shots
Capture more photos
Wider angle lens
20 mm vs 24 mm
Capture more of the scene
Slow-motion videos
Yes vs No
Shoot slow-motion videos
Higher extended ISO
6400 vs 3200 ISO
Higher extended ISO can give more low-light flexibility

Canon SX520 HS advantages over Samsung WB2200F

Lighter weight
441g vs 608g
Lighter weight
Longer exposure
15 vs 8 sec
Long exposures for night shots
Faster JPEG shooting
10.0 fps vs 6.8 fps
Faster JPEG shooting (burst mode)

Similarities

Common Strengths

In-Camera Image Stabilization
Both provide
Reduces the effects of camera shake at slower shutter speeds
Internal flash
Both provide
Useful in a pinch for fill flash
Manual focus
Both provide
AF is for the weak. Real photographers focus manually.
HDMI out
Both provide
Use HDMI output to monitor or review video

Common Weaknesses

Focus peaking
Neither provide
Your camera will highlight what's in focus
Tilt-swivel screen
Neither provide
Tilt and swivel the screen for maximum shooting flexibility
Touchscreen
Neither provide
Interact with your camera just like your smartphone
Tiltable Screen
Neither provide
Tilt the screen for shooting flexbility
RAW file ability
Neither provide
Gives you more flexibility to develop your photos later
Built-in Bluetooth
Neither provide
Always-on wireless connectivity
Built-in GPS
Neither provide
Geotag your photos
On-sensor phase detect
Neither provide
Usually improves live view and video AF performance
Integrated ND filter
Neither provide
Shoot in daylight with a large aperture or slow shutter
External Mic Jack
Neither provide
Improved sound fidelity when shooting video
Hot shoe
Neither provide
Off-camera flashes open new possibilities
Headphone jack
Neither provide
Monitor audio recording while you shoot video
Bulb shutter
Neither provide
Hold the shutter open manually for long exposures

Buy From

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Samsung WB2200F

Samsung WB2200F

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Canon SX520 HS

Canon SX520 HS

Review Excerpt

We haven’t finished our review of the Samsung WB2200F, but we have extensive sample photos and a hands-on report.
Read our Samsung WB2200F Shooter's Report

We haven’t reviewed the Canon SX520 HS.
Read our Canon SX520 HS Preview

The Competition

Compared to Fujifilm SL1000

Samsung WB2200F

Fujifilm SL1000

$675
1/2.3 inch

In-camera panoramas
Built-in Wi-Fi

$650
1/2.3 inch

Slower slow-motion
Tiltable Screen

Compare Samsung WB2200F vs Fujifilm SL1000

Canon SX520 HS

Fujifilm SL1000

$345
1/2.3 inch

Thinner
Lighter weight

$650
1/2.3 inch

Eye-level viewfinder
Larger lens aperture

Compare Canon SX520 HS vs Fujifilm SL1000

Compared to Panasonic FZ70

Samsung WB2200F

Panasonic FZ70

$675
1/2.3 inch

Built-in Wi-Fi
NFC

$660
1/2.3 inch

RAW file ability
Hot shoe

Compare Samsung WB2200F vs Panasonic FZ70

Canon SX520 HS

Panasonic FZ70

$345
1/2.3 inch

Lighter weight

$660
1/2.3 inch

Eye-level viewfinder
In-camera panoramas

Compare Canon SX520 HS vs Panasonic FZ70

Compared to Olympus SP-100

Samsung WB2200F

Olympus SP-100

$675
1/2.3 inch

Slower slow-motion
Built-in Wi-Fi

$600
1/2.3 inch

Less shutter lag
Shoots 60p video

Compare Samsung WB2200F vs Olympus SP-100

Canon SX520 HS

Olympus SP-100

$345
1/2.3 inch

Thinner
Lighter weight

$600
1/2.3 inch

Eye-level viewfinder
In-camera panoramas

Compare Canon SX520 HS vs Olympus SP-100

Compared to Canon SX530 HS

Samsung WB2200F

Canon SX530 HS

$675
1/2.3 inch

Eye-level viewfinder
In-camera panoramas

$259
1/2.3 inch

Lighter weight
Longer exposure

Compare Samsung WB2200F vs Canon SX530 HS

Canon SX520 HS

Canon SX530 HS

$345
1/2.3 inch

Faster JPEG shooting

$259
1/2.3 inch

Built-in Wi-Fi
More telephoto lens reach

Compare Canon SX520 HS vs Canon SX530 HS

Compared to Canon SX540 HS

Samsung WB2200F

Canon SX540 HS

$675
1/2.3 inch

Eye-level viewfinder
In-camera panoramas

$364
1/2.3 inch

Lighter weight
More pixels

Compare Samsung WB2200F vs Canon SX540 HS

Canon SX520 HS

Canon SX540 HS

$345
1/2.3 inch

Faster JPEG shooting

$364
1/2.3 inch

Built-in Wi-Fi
More telephoto lens reach

Compare Canon SX520 HS vs Canon SX540 HS

Compare Other Cameras?